Allen v. Allen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Does an appeal lie from an ex parte abuse prevention order issued pursuant to G. L. c. 209A, in circumstances where the order was terminated ten days later at a hearing after notice pursuant to c. 209A, § 4? We conclude that termination of the ex parte order at the hearing after notice, accompanied by an order directing law enforcement agencies “to destroy all record of such vacated order,” renders the defendant’s appeal moot. G. L. c. 209A, § 7, as appearing in St. 1990, c. 403, § 8. We accordingly dismiss the appeal.
Background. On April 3, 2015, the plaintiff filed a complaint for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Wooldridge v. HickeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Vaccaro v. VaccaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- E.C.O. v. ComptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gassman v. ReasonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- In re F.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- C.R.S. v. J.M.S.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- V.M. v. R.B.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- B.C. v. F.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.