Cooper v. Wagner
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
There is no question that the better rule is that a foreclosure proceeding is no bar to a concurrence or successive suit upon a purchase money note secured by mortgage or vendor’s lien, unless it appears that the note has been paid by a satisfaction of a judgment or through the sale of the property in such proceeding. 19 R.Q.L., pages 509 to 512, §§305, 306, 307, 308, 309.
It is also well-settled that payment is a substantive defense and must be pleaded in order to be proved. Worst v Colonial Savings Bank & Trust Co., 11 Oh Ap, 308.
Payment was not alleged or claimed by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Savings & Loan Co. v. KupetzOhio Court of Appeals · 1930