Perry v. Griefen
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions by defendant. Assumpsit to recover balance due on account annexed, and also to recover damages occasioned by the refusal of tlie defendant to accept certain brick, which, it was alleged, the defendant agreed to purchase of the plaintiff. The ease is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPeabody, J.
The plaintiffs sued out of the clerk’s office of this court in York county an original writ of attachment dated February 24, 1903, against the defendant, Richard A. Griefen, returnable at the May Term, 1903, in York county. In this writ the defendant was described as of Chicago in the state of Illinois. The declaration was for merchandise sold and delivered. The writ was placed in the hands of a deputy sheriff for York County, who made upon it the following returns, viz: •
“State of Maine.
York ss. Kittery, Feb. 24, 1903 at three o’clock in the afternoon :
By virtue of the within writ I attached…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kennedy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Baltimore & O. R. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Inhabitants of Dover-Foxcroft v. Inhabitants of LincolnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
- B.J. Tidwell Industries, Inc. v. ZawackiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009