Legal Opinion

Texas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sealock

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 24, 1987No. 05-86-00577-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

The appellee-employee, Glenn D. Sealock, and the appellant-employer, Texas Federal Savings & Loan Association, had a written employment agreement. The agreement contained a “golden parachute” provision. The term “golden parachute” refers generally to agreements between a corporation and its top officers which guarantee those officers continued employment, payment of a lump sum, or other benefits in the event of a change of corporate ownership. Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 472 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 2458, 2460 n. 2, 86 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). A corporate reorganization…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. West End API, Ltd. v. Rothpletz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaspar v. Thorne, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Qwest Microwave, Inc. v. Bedard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Resource Savings Ass'n v. Neary, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. Sealock v. Texas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Edinburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API