Texas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sealock
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
WHITHAM, Justice.
The appellee-employee, Glenn D. Sealock, and the appellant-employer, Texas Federal Savings & Loan Association, had a written employment agreement. The agreement contained a “golden parachute” provision. The term “golden parachute” refers generally to agreements between a corporation and its top officers which guarantee those officers continued employment, payment of a lump sum, or other benefits in the event of a change of corporate ownership. Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 472 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 2458, 2460 n. 2, 86 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). A corporate reorganization…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- West End API, Ltd. v. Rothpletz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kaspar v. Thorne, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Qwest Microwave, Inc. v. Bedard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Resource Savings Ass'n v. Neary, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Sealock v. Texas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Edinburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.