Legal Opinion

Kaspar v. Thorne

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 29, 1988No. 05-87-00750-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

Lansing S. Thome sued Henry N. Ras-par, seeking: 1) declaratory judgment that Raspar was liable under a certain promissory note; 2) money damages for breach of fiduciary duty owned to Thome by Raspar; and 3) appointment of a receiver to liquidate F.F.P., Inc., the corporation in which Raspar and Thorne each own fifty percent of the capital stock. After a jury trial, the trial court granted the declaratory judgment, declaring that the promissory note was “enforceable and collectable against Henry N. Raspar,” and awarding Thome $18,000.00 in attorney’s fees. The judgment also…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Houston N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. West End API, Ltd. v. Rothpletz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Dodson v. KungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Texas Prudential Insurance Company v. DillardTexas Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hoggett v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Redmon v. Griffith, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  4. Pabich v. KellarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Willis v. Donnelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API