Legal Opinion

Meek v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1915No. 8090PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Gunnison District Court. Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought suit for damages against plaintiffs in error, as defendants. Three causes of action were embodied in the complaint. The first was for conversion of plaintiff’s property, and the destruction of her business; the second, for unlawful arrest and false imprisonment, and the third, for deporting her from the town and county in which she resided. The basis of the action was that the defendants entered into a conspiracy to *463commit the wrongs charged, and in pursuance thereof actually committed them. The Colorado Yule Marble Company, and The Crystal River and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  2. City of Denver v. HyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. Dunshee v. Standard Oil CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Holt v. United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Gronan v. KukkuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Lakewood Country ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Bushman Construction Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Miller v. SingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Wettlin v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API