Legal Opinion

Branson v. Department of Revenue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1994No. 4-93-0826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In July 1989, the Illinois Department of Revenue (Department) issued notices of penalty liability (NPLs) to plaintiff, Carl E. Branson, and his wife, Bonnie Branson, as responsible parties pursuant to section 13½ of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 120, par. 452½). The penalties assessed related to unpaid taxes, interest, and penalties owed by Carbon, Inc. (Carbon), which operated Branson’s Family Restaurant, from June 1986 through the restaurant’s closing in January 1987. An administrative law judge (ALJ) recommended upholding the penalty assessment against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Local 268Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lou Brounstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Walter H. Schroeder, Josephine J. Schroeder, and Louis BrodnanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Department of Revenue v. Heartland Investments, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Denton v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF STATEAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Illinois, Department of Revenue v. Raleigh (In Re Stoecker)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. SEDOL Teachers Union v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API