Legal Opinion

Perlman v. Feldmann

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1952No. Civ. A. 3086PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

I

1. The plaintiff Jane Perlman and the plaintiff-intervenor Harry Mernoff are citizens of the United States and of the State of New York. The other plaintiffs are all citizens of the United States and of the State of Illinois. The plaintiffs each own shares of the common stock of Newport Steel Corporation which they acquired prior to August 31, 1950.

2. The defendant Newport is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana, and thus a citizen of that state. The other defendants are all citizens of the United States and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Irving Trust Co. v. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Durfee v. Durfee & Canning, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Wayne Pike Co. v. HammonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Insuranshares Corporation v. Northern Fiscal Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Essex Universal Corporation v. Herbert J. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. In Re Guidant Shareholders DerivativeIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ritter v. DollensIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Essex Universal Corporation v. Herbert J. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API