Paquin v. Tillinghast
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a civil action arising out of an automobile collision. The defendant alleges the trial court erred in instructing the jury and in denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the issue of damages.
On March 3, 1981, plaintiff 1 and defendant were involved in an automobile collision at the intersection of Main Street and Route 102 in North Smithfield. The plaintiff was traveling north on Route 102; defendant west on Main Street. Both crossed the intersection simultaneously and collided. Both were injured.
At trial plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ryan v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Santa Maria v. TrottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Barratt v. BurlinghamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Eldridge v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Soares v. Ann & Hope of Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Wilson Auto Enterprises, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
- Errico v. LaMountainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Pacheco-RiveraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.