Legal Opinion

Maxus Exploration Co. v. Moran Bros., Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1991No. C-8984PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

At issue in this case is the enforceability of an indemnity clause in a contract between two companies, each with its principal place of business in Texas, for the drilling of an oil well in Kansas. We hold that Kansas law applies, and that the indemnity clause is valid. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

I

Moran Bros., Inc. agreed to drill an oil well in Kansas for Diamond Shamrock Exploration Co., now Maxus Exploration Co. Moran, a Texas corporation, and Diamond Shamrock, a Delaware corporation, negotiated their contract in Texas, where each has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ethyl Corp. v. Daniel Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Enserch Corp. v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Theriot v. Bay Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Page Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Peter Weber v. Pact XPP Technologies, AGCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Hughes Wood Products, Inc. v. WagnerTexas Supreme Court · 2000

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API