Legal Opinion

Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 25, 2003, which, inter alia, denied class certification to plaintiff policyholders in this action alleging deceptive sales techniques, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate questions of fact common to the class which predominate over questions affecting only individual members (CPLR 901 [a] [2]; Canavan v Chase Manhattan Bank, 234 AD2d 493, 494 [1996]). “Deceptive acts or practices” (General Business Law § 349) implies more than simply an invented scheme or marketing strategy, but rather an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Carnegie v. H&R Block, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Canavan v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Russo v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solomon v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Newman v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. Kudinov v. Kel-Tech Construction Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. DeFilippo v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Smilen v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API