Legal Opinion

State, Division of Elections v. Metcalfe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2005No. S-11618PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court granted a preliminary injunction to a third-party political candidate based upon a claim of uneonstitutionality of state ballot access laws. The injunction compelled the State of Alaska to include, despite the candidate’s noncompliance with such laws, the candidate’s name and party on the November 2004 general ballot for United States Senator. We heard the state’s petition for review on an expedited basis in order to provide a ruling before the final ballot printing deadline. Because there was no clear showing of probable success on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jenness v. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Munro v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Green Party of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Alsworth v. SeybertAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Capolicchio v. LevyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Alyse S. GalvinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API