Legal Opinion

Howard v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the District Court of Greer County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The appellant, Samuel Howard, was tried and convicted of the crime of stealing domestic animals, under section one of article two of chapter twenty of the session laws of 1895, which provides:

“That if any person shall steal any stallion, mare, colt, gelding, ridgling, or any ass, jenet, or mule, or any bull, cow, calf, steer or stag> he shall be guilty of a felony and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by confinement in the territorial penitentiary for a term of not less than one nor more than ten years.”

The indictment in this ease charged the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Cox v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Stricker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API