Legal Opinion

Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1981No. 46959-8PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

Hindquarter Corporation sought a declaratory judgment establishing its right to exercise a lease renewal option. The trial court ruled that since Hindquarter had often been late in making its rental payments, Hindquarter's option was unenforceable. Finding that the payment of rent was not a condition precedent to the exercise of the option, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case so that Hindquarter could be awarded damages for the landlord's failure to extend the lease. We reverse the Court of Appeals and affirm in part the judgment of the trial court.

In 1976, Property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Nork v. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Lutterloh v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Gadsden Bowling Center, Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Corbray v. StevensonWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Glesener v. BalholmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. R. R. Gable, Inc. v. BurrowsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API