Legal Opinion
Beitel v. AIL Systems, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 26, 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
—In related actions which were joined for trial (1) to recover damages for personal injuries, etc. (Action No. 1), and (2) to recover damages for property damage (Action No. 2), the defendant Schumacher & Forelle, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated June 19, 1995, as denied the branches of its cross motion which were (a) for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ causes of action to recover damages under Labor Law § 200 and for common-law negligence in Action No. 1 insofar as asserted against it and (b)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Macey v. TrumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- McGlynn v. Brooklyn Hospital-Caledonian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Nunnenkamp v. Bay Point AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.