Legal Opinion

Macey v. Truman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1987PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

Defendant permitted plaintiff, Greg Macey, and two others entry onto his land to cut certain trees which had been marked for removal for plaintiff’s use in building a log cabin. The accident out of which this action arose occurred when a marked tree felled by Macey and his companions became entangled in a standing tree that was unmarked. After unsuccessful efforts to dislodge the marked tree, they decided to take down…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Schoonmaker v. Ridge Runners Club 99, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Macey v. TrumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Weller v. Colleges of SenecasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Capozzi v. HuhneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Jarvis v. EastmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Dumoulin v. Oval Wood Dish Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Farrell v. LabarberaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API