Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Dillsburg & Mechanicsburg Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county : Of May Term 1874, No. 62. (Re-argument.) This was an action of assumpsit, brought to the April Term 1872, of the court below, by the Dillsburg and Mechanicsburg Railroad Company against Andrew Garrett. The action was to recover the amount of subscription by the defendant to the capital stock of the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland county : Of May Term 1874, No. 62. (Re-argument.) This was an action of assumpsit, brought to the April Term 1872, of the court below, by the Dillsburg and Mechanicsburg Railroad Company against Andrew Garrett. The action was to recover the amount of subscription by the defendant to the capital stock of the plaintiffs. The case of Bucher against the same company, 26 P. F. Smith 306, was a suit on a subscription to the same stock, under somewhat different circumstances. The plaintiffs were incorporated under the Railroad Law of April 4th 1868,…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Agnew

It is clear that the charter of the railroad company cannot be attacked collaterally for bad faith' in obtaining it; Cochran v. Arnold, 8 P. F. Smith 399. The only question, therefore, is whether the subscription of the defendant is illegal and void, because of the non-payment of any part in cash at the time of *468making it. The law does not expressly require payment of ten per cent, or any other sum when making an original subscription before application for the charter. Whether non-payment of ten per cent, by each subscriber, before application for the charter, is not an act of bad faith to…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bole v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Berwick Hotel Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Auburn Bolt & Nut Works v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Jeannette Bottle Works v. SchallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Goodbread v. Philadelphia, Bala & Bryn Mawr Turnpike Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API