Simkins v. Pulley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The primary contention urged on this appeal from consolidated actions in the Superior Court is that the trial judge abused his discretion when he granted motions for new trial relating to both actions because of inconsistent verdicts' returned by the jury.
The actions involved personal injury claims of a City of Phoenix police officer and his two passengers for injuries resulting when the police officer swerved his patrol car off the road and collided with a palm tree. The swerve off the road resulted from the officer’s successful attempt to avoid a collision with a vehicle…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Page v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Di Orio v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Spettigue v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Brown v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Milliken v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gibson v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In re Joel R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Roundy v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Gibson v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.