Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Ledwidge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 1981No. DA 173880, CA 18013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant was charged with violation of a park curfew, Portland City Ordinance 2.12.210. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state a crime and that the ordinance was unconstitutional.1 The trial court sustained defendant’s motion on both grounds. The city appeals.

Portland City Ordinance 2.12.210 provides:

"It is unlawful for any person to be in a park any time between the hours of twelve-one a.m. and the following five a.m. This section shall not apply to the following, which are affirmative defenses:
"(1) Vehicular traffic crossing a park on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. SarriaOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  3. State v. SarriaOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API