Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Ledwidge
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 9, 1981No. DA 173880, CA 18013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant was charged with violation of a park curfew, Portland City Ordinance 2.12.210. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state a crime and that the ordinance was unconstitutional.1 The trial court sustained defendant’s motion on both grounds. The city appeals.
Portland City Ordinance 2.12.210 provides:
"It is unlawful for any person to be in a park any time between the hours of twelve-one a.m. and the following five a.m. This section shall not apply to the following, which are affirmative defenses:
"(1) Vehicular traffic crossing a park on a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. SarriaOregon Supreme Court · 2026
- State v. SarriaOregon Supreme Court · 2026