Legal Opinion
Olds v. Brown Shoe Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 29, 1938No. 35PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLET, District Judge.
Speaking in “seasonable” language, the petition in this case is a double barreled affair. It charges the defendant Brown Shoe Company and Riley Poison, Superintendent of that company’s Moberly, Mo., shoe factory, with negligently requiring plaintiff to work in a place and under conditions which were unhealthy to him and also charges both defendants with failing to provide certain and numerous safety devices allegedly required by the Missouri Statutes (Secs. 13232, 13234, 13252, 13254, R.S.Mo.1929, Mo.St.Ann. §§ 13232, 13234, 13252, 13254, pp. 4796, 4803, 4804). The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Clark v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
- Davis v. Standard Oil Co. of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Brunski v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Citizens National Bank v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Flowers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946