Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Lord v. Bruennemer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court' of Kankakee county; the Hon. C. R. Starr, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

This suit was begun by information in the nature of a quo warranto against appellees to test their right to exercise corporate privileges as a township board of education. Appellees pleaded to the information, and, issues being made and tried before the court, the information was dismissed at the cost of the relator.

A motion by appellees to dismiss the appeal was taken with the case, and will be first disposed of. The grounds of the motion are, that the proceeding is of a criminal nature and the People can have no appeal, since such action would place the defendants twice in jeopardy, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Weber v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Clark v. People ex rel. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. People ex rel. Dixon v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. People v. O'HairIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Trustees of Schools of Township 9 v. People ex rel. UpdikeIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. City of Pontiac v. Central Union Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People ex rel. Saunier v. StrattonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. People ex rel. Darnell v. WoodwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. People Ex Rel. Groff v. Board of Education of Crossville Community High School District No. 120Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People ex rel. Croft v. KarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API