Richey v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Bartholomew Circuit Court; Marshall Hacker, Judge. Action by Walter C. Richey against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, P. J.
— Appellant filed a complaint in the court below in two paragraphs. He afterwards dismissed the first paragraph, and a demurrer for want of facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained to the second paragraph. Appellant refused to amend or plead further and judgment was rendered against him. From this judgment, he appeals to this court, and assigns as error the ruling of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer to the second paragraph of his complaint.
This paragraph of complaint is as follows: “The plaintiff, Walter C. Richey, for a second and further paragraph of amended…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- State v. Cudahy Packing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
- Thacker v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wm. P. Jungclaus Co. v. RattiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- American Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. YonanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Skeel v. Prest-O-Lite Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bennett v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911