Arnold v. Oliver
New York Supreme Court
Before Beady, P. Jam.d Daniels, J. Appeals from two orders, one allowing the defendant to reargue a motion previously made and decided, or to renew such motion upon further papers, and the other granting the motion allowed to be so made, and canceling the judgment affected by it.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
The judgment which was directed to be canceled and discharged by the final order was recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant on the 10th of March, 1876. The indebtedness was contracted before the 26th of February, 1876, on which day the defendant filed his petition for his adjudication in bankruptcy. Under the proceedings commenced he was adjudged a bankrupt and, on the 31st day of July, 1876, discharged from all debts existing against him on the twenty-sixth day of February of that year. As the judgment, according .to the decision which was made in Monroe agt. Upton (50 N. Y., 593),…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belmont v. Erie Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1869
- Lindenmuller v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Monroe v. . UptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Arnold v. TreviranusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Arnold v. TreviranusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Stern v. MeyerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Wells v. EdmisonSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1885