Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. State Educational Retirement Board
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1996No. 16501PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
1. Petitioner, Sharon O’Neal Wirtz (Wirtz), appeals the denial of her motion in the district court for attorney fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Supp.1992). Wirtz raises seven issues on appeal. She alleges that the district court erred: (1) in denying amendment of the caption; (2) in determining that the petition did not provide adequate notice of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) claim; (3) in applying general pleading requirements to a common law certiorari petition for a “claim of error”; (4) in finding that the Educational Retirement Board (ERB) would.be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hill v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Edmonds v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.