Legal Opinion
Edmonds v. Martinez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 2009No. 28,029PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBLES, Judge.
{1} Respondent Charlie Martinez, a former sheriff of Taos County, appeals a district court award of attorney fees and a finding of contempt of court for failure to properly and timely comply with a writ of mandamus. Martinez argues that (1) process was not served in accordance with Rule 1-004(F) NMRA and, therefore, the district court did not have personal jurisdiction over Martinez; (2) a finding of contempt is inappropriate when a peremptory writ is obtained, and the writ is not properly served on the respondent; (3) the facts and law do not support a finding of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Schneider National Inc. v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Trujillo v. GoodwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sawyer v. USAA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Executive Consulting, Inc. v. KilmerDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Moreno v. Taos County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- White v. FarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re Estate of McElvenyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.