Legal Opinion
Motaghedi v. Blinken
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 30, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01466Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 SEYED AMIN SAM MOTAGHEDI, et al., 1:19-cv-01466-LJO-SKO 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 8 v. TO DISMISS 9 MICHAEL R. POMPEO, et al., (ECF No. 29) 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 On October 15, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that Defendants withheld adjudications 15 of case-by-case waivers of Presidential Proclamation 9645, Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and 16 Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety 17 Threats (“PP 9645”).…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.