Legal Opinion
People v. Tallman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
*1083We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contentions, the record reflects that County Court honored its commitment to consider defendant for the Willard program, ultimately determining that it was not appropriate in this case, and sentenced her as agreed. Moreover, defendant declined to withdraw her guilty plea when afforded the opportunity, accepting instead a more lenient sentence. Under these circumstances, defendant was clearly afforded the full benefit of her plea agreement (see generally People v Ruddy, 77 AD3d 983, 984 [2010]; People v Sheils, 288 AD2d 504, 505-506 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PlantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SheilsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RuddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CopesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- COPES, BRETT E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. CopesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HonnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.