Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. McKenzie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 2016Published

1Dissent

Smith, J.P., and Troutman, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. We disagree with the conclusion of the majority that defendant was deprived of his right to counsel because his attorney permitted him to choose a member of the jury. We conclude that the record establishes that defense counsel acceded to defendant’s request to permit the juror at issue to be seated on the trial jury, and we would therefore affirm the judgment.

We agree with the majority that “[t]he selection of particular jurors falls within the category of tactical decisions entrusted to counsel, and defendants do not retain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. SprowalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API