Legal Opinion

Knox v. Sprague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for fraud, the defendants Jordan Berkman and Arlyne Berkman appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J.), dated June 25, 1997, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them for failure to state a cause of action and failure to comply with the specificity requirements of CPLR 3016 (b).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The complaint stated a cause of action against the appellants sounding in fraud with sufficient specificity so as to comply with CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Black v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Black v. ChittendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. F.S. Intertrade Office Products, Inc. v. BabinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Lawatsch v. CooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romanoff Restaurant & Cabaret, Inc. v. OugoulavaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API