Legal Opinion
Glover v. Astrue
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 6, 2011No. 3:10-CV-824-PKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1005OPINION & ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
In a September 20, 2011 Order, 2011 WL 4442295, I adopted in part Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation (# 29), in which he recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner to deny Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to plaintiff. I adopted all of Magistrate Judge Papak’s findings except his finding that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) had properly rejected lay witness testimony.
As I explained in the Order, cases in the Ninth Circuit appear to hold both that an ALJ may reject…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claudia Esther Bojorquez v. Andrew SaulDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Parchen v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019