Legal Opinion

Coley Farming Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The first contention of defendants is: “The motion for nonsuit and the prayer for a directed verdict should have been granted. So far as we have been able to find, this is a ease of first *66impression in this State. It has been held in many cases that proof of receipt by a carrier in good condition, and delivery in a damaged condition furnished sufficient proof to call upon the carrier to go forward with the evidence. An examination of these cases, however, will disclose that the injuries invariably consisted of broken bones, cuts, wounds, or other manifest and physical injuries. No such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Everett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawshe v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API