Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Barrett
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2013No. 12-1222PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Nick Lynch claims Defendants Adam Barrett, Stephen Kenfield, and Michael Morelock, all police officers for Defendant City and County of Denver, violated his constitutional right to court access by refusing to disclose who exercised excessive force against him in the course of an arrest. Plaintiff further claims Defendant City violated his right to court access by adopting a policy and practice that precipitated the “conspiracy of silence” waged against him. As to Plaintiffs first claim, the district court entered an order denying Defendant Officers qualified…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Cox v. GlanzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Gutierrez v. Luna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Quinn v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Angie Waller v. City of Fort Worth Texas, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Crowson v. Washington County State, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.