Legal Opinion

In re Dowell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 6, 2006No. 2006-B-1201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

■JjThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, David Jack Dowell, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently ineligible to practice.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In July or August 2001, Stacey Dagsaan Stratton hired respondent to handle her father’s succession. At the time, respondent was employed by the law firm of Windhorst, Gaudry, Ranson, Higgins & Gremillion (“Windhorst”). Despite his *995full-time employment with Windhorst, respondent handled the succession as a private…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re DowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In re DowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API