Legal Opinion
Sherrod v. McHugh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 7, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0816PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint
Plaintiffs move to amend their complaint a second time to clarify the factual circumstances surrounding their previous claims and add a new claim for negligence against Individual Defendant Diane Schulz. See Mot. Leave File Second Am. Compl. (“Pls.’ Mot. Amend.”). 1 District Defendants take no position on the motion. See Pls.’ Mot. Amend at 1. Individual Defendant Schulz opposes the motion insofar as it seeks to add the new negligence count, arguing that (1) Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adams v. Gould Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dormu v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Roller Bearing Co. of America, Inc. v. American Software, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Palacios v. Medstar Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Astudillo v. Salon MacOmb, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Bronner v. DugganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Channing Bete Company, Inc. v. GreenbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.