In Re Prevo
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING IN PART DEBTOR’S OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM OF CITI RESIDENTIAL LENDING
[Docket No. 22]
JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.
At the conclusion of its opinion in Parsley, this Court cautioned that it would continue to monitor the behavior of mortgage lenders and their counsel in order to ensure that the errors and mistakes that occurred in that case would not happen again. In re Parsley, 384 B.R. 138, 184-85 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.2008). Unfortunately, this Chapter 13 case is yet another example of the haphazard practices of a member of the mortgage industry. 1 Due to their size…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re ArmstrongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Sanchez v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Sanchez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Tate v. NationsBanc Mortgage Corp. (In Re Tate)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
- eCast Settlement Corp. v. Tran (In Re Tran)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re HenryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re GilbreathUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- In Re WellsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Harker v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- 201 Forest Street LLC v. LBM Financial LLC (In Re 201 Forest Street LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Moore & Moore Trucking, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020