Legal Opinion

Nissho Iwai American Corporation and Nike, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 12, 1998No. 97-1489PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Nissho Iwai American Corporation and Nike, Inc. (collectively “Nike”) appeal from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the classification of certain athletic footwear under the basket provision subheadings 6402.91.80, 6402.91.90, and 6402.99.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), dutiable at 20% or at 90 cents per pair plus 20%. In rejecting the importers’ arguments, the court determined that the footwear at issue could not bé classified under subheadings 6402.91.40 or 6402.99.15, dutiable at 6%, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Guess? Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Rack Room Shoes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Brother International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  5. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API