Nissho Iwai American Corporation and Nike, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Nissho Iwai American Corporation and Nike, Inc. (collectively “Nike”) appeal from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the classification of certain athletic footwear under the basket provision subheadings 6402.91.80, 6402.91.90, and 6402.99.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), dutiable at 20% or at 90 cents per pair plus 20%. In rejecting the importers’ arguments, the court determined that the footwear at issue could not bé classified under subheadings 6402.91.40 or 6402.99.15, dutiable at 6%, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lonza, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Guess? Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Jvc Company of America, Division of Us Jvc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Rack Room Shoes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Brother International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.