Legal Opinion

Knappenburg v. Rowan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 16, 1919No. 74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. In the matter of John H. Reilly and Thomas P. Reilly, individually and as copartners under the firm name and style of Reilly Bros., bankrupts. From an order requiring James A. Rowan to pay the-balance of purchase price bid for the bankrupts’ assets, Rowan appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. In the matter of John H. Reilly and Thomas P. Reilly, individually and as copartners under the firm name and style of Reilly Bros., bankrupts. From an order requiring James A. Rowan to pay the-balance of purchase price bid for the bankrupts’ assets, Rowan appeals. An order in bankruptcy was made requiring appellant, a purchaser at a sale of the assets of the bankrupts, to pay the balance of the pur - chase price on the bid made by him for such assets. This appeal is from the order.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Reilly Bros, were adjudicated bankrupts, and their assets, consisting, among other things, of card records, were sold by the trustee appointed in bankruptcy proceedings, at public auction. The appellant, James A. Rowan, was the highest bidder, and his bid was accepted. He refused to pay the balance of the purchase price. Thereupon the trustee obtained an order to show cause, returnable before the District Court on May 15, 1916, requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the balance of the purchase price, as he bid, for these card records. The card records…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirsner v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
  2. In re Franklin Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. In re MertensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  4. In re ShidlovskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  5. In re CaponigriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henkin v. FousekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Schoenfeld v. StiensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API