Legal Opinion
Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham Hotel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 2003No. CIV.A. 99-3315 (RBW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
I. Background
In this employment discrimination action, plaintiff, Lillie Teneyck (“Teneyck”), claims that defendant, the Omni Shoreham Hotel, discriminated against her by not hiring her for a vacant housekeeper position because of her race (black) and national origin (United States born) 1 in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and because of her age (over 40 years) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. A jury trial in this matter commenced on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Teneyck, Lillie v. Omni Shoreham HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Brown v. SmallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.