Legal Opinion
Foster v. Foster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 18, 1965No. 31PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Plaintiff and defendant filed in this Court an additional agreement of facts signed by counsel for both parties, reading as follows:
“1. That on May 9, 1963, Pamela Sue Foster, daughter of plaintiff and defendant herein, was an unemancipated minor age 4 months and resided in the home of her parents at Route 2, Bel-haven, North Carolina.
“2. That at the time of the institution of this action, Pamela Sue Foster was still unemancipated and residing in the home of her parents.”
Defendant has one assignment of error, and that is to the signing of the judgment. This presents for review the question as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Tidd v. . SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Carver v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Shook v. CrabbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Luna Dale Roscoe v. Joseph A. RoscoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Mogford v. MogfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.