Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Janitschek

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 22, 1960PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in that court, and the matter is remanded to the trial judge who heard the ease for reconsideration and a new determination.

For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet-TINO—7.

For affirmance—Hone.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. United Jersey Bank v. WolosoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Matter of Grand Jury SubpoenasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Metalsalts Corp. v. WeissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API