Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeCenzo
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The question in this case is whether an insured may “stack” the coverage for bodily injury caused by an underinsured motorist under separate motor vehicle liability insurance policies covering three different automobiles. The Superior Court judge who heard the case without jury ruled that he could not, and, relying on Royal Indem. Co. v. Blakely, 372 Mass. 86 (1977), and Nissenbaum v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 16 Mass. App. Ct. 996 (1983), we affirm.
In 1979 Robert A. DeCenzo owned three automobiles each of which was covered by Massachusetts automobile insurance policy issued by Lum-bermens…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Slater v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- MacBey v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Wilcox v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commerce Insurance v. KochMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeCenzoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Home Indemnity Insurance v. Merchants Distributors, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984