Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Conte

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 19, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

In this holdover summary proceeding petitioner prime tenant of a rent stabilized apartment seeks to regain possession after the expiration of respondent’s subtenancy. Respondent in opposition takes the startling position that he may not be evicted except upon one of the special grounds set forth in sections 53 and 54 of the Code of the Real Estate Industry Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc. (Rent Stabilization Code), and none are alleged in the petition.

I say startling because, if respondent’s position is upheld, it would seem to mean that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

Conrad v. Third Sutton Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

Muller v. SteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982