Legal Opinion

Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 2001No. CX-01-165Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, ROBERT H., Judge.

Appellant Illinois Farmers Insurance Company challenges the district court’s decision on the distribution of no-fault insurance benefits to respondent Daniel J. Scheibel. Illinois Farmers contends that the district court erred in interpreting and applying the decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court in Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 615 N.W.2d 34 (Minn.2000). We affirm.

FACTS

In March 1996 and again in May 1996, Scheibel was injured in two separate rear-end automobile accidents. He received medical treatment after each accident, including back surgery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Scheibel v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Twomey v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Great West Casualty Co. v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API