Legal Opinion
Briceno v. Saul
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 18, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01984Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARMIDA B., Case No.: 20-cv-01984-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MERITS 13 v. BRIEF 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, (ECF Nos. 11, 12) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On October 8, 2020, plaintiff Armida B. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social 20 Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income 21 (“SSI”) benefits. (ECF No. 1.) 22 Now pending before the Court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.