Legal Opinion

Ryall v. Waterworks Improvement Dist. No. 3

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1969No. 5-5060PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This appeal comes from the chancellor’s order which the appellants assert dismissed their petition for a permanent injunction against appellee Waterworks Improvement District No. 3.

The appellants filed a complaint seeking to enjoin the improvement district and its commissioners from proceeding with the construction and installation of a sewage treatment plant near the town of Star City. Appellants sought a temporary injunction and .asked that upon a final hearing a permanent injunction be issued together with an award for damages in the sum of $10,-000 against the district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Evans v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Groves v. KeeneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. City of HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. O'Dell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, Inc. v. EshamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. ConnorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Yellow Cab Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API