Ryall v. Waterworks Improvement Dist. No. 3
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
This appeal comes from the chancellor’s order which the appellants assert dismissed their petition for a permanent injunction against appellee Waterworks Improvement District No. 3.
The appellants filed a complaint seeking to enjoin the improvement district and its commissioners from proceeding with the construction and installation of a sewage treatment plant near the town of Star City. Appellants sought a temporary injunction and .asked that upon a final hearing a permanent injunction be issued together with an award for damages in the sum of $10,-000 against the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Evans v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Groves v. KeeneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. City of HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- O'Dell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, Inc. v. EshamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. ConnorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Yellow Cab Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.