Legal Opinion

Jilin Forest Indus. Jinqiao Flooring Grp. Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 9, 2023No. 18-00191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Court No. 18-00191 Page 2 accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (July 18, 2018), PR1 340 (“Final IDM”). See Jilin Forest Indus. Jinqiao Flooring Grp. Co. v. United States,

45 CIT __,

519 F. Supp. 3d 1224

(2021) (“Jilin I”). On remand, Commerce again determined that mandatory respondent Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. (“Jilin”) had failed to rebut the presumption that it is state controlled. In addition, although given an opportunity to do so by the Jilin I order, Commerce chose not to determine an individual rate for Jilin separate from the rate established for the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  2. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API