Dash v. Inabinet
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Orangeburg, September^ 1897,; Action by Bailra V. Dash v. John H. Inabinet, administrator of John Inabinet, for nurse bill.
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Orangeburg, September^ 1897,; Action by Bailra V. Dash v. John H. Inabinet, administrator of John Inabinet, for nurse bill. From judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cite: Nonsu,it improper where there is any testimony tending to establish material allegations of complaint: 16 S. C., 397; 22 S. C., 4: 38 S. C., 485: 41 S. C., 485; 44 S. C., 317; 43 S. C., 537; 29 S. C.-, 318; 35 S. C., 576. Facts proved tended to show tmplied contract and agreement: 45 Am. R., 396; 16 Ill., 296; 13 Wend., 460; 65 Barb., 645; 2 Hill, 576. Existence of implied contract is for jury to say:…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chiee Justice McIver.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the value of her services rendered the intestate during his lifetime. The testimony tended to show that the plaintiff was the daughter of the intestate, and upon her marriage, some twenty-odd years ago, she, with her husband, at the urgent request of her father, continued to live with him up to the time of his death, which occurred on the 3d of December, 1894; that plaintiff cooked, ironed, scoured, sewed, and did all the house work and washing, and also cooked for the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Hursey v. SurlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Wessinger v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Maxwell v. EptonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Brabham v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.