Brabham v. Turner
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Mauldin, J., Bamberg, March, 1921. Proceedings on a claim of H. M. Brabham against Mrs. Lura Brabham, as executrix of Sue Turner, deceased, opposed by T. E. Turner, a brother of deceased, and a legatee under'her will. From an order of the Circuit Court sustaining the allowance of the claim by the Probate Judge, T. E. Turner appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Mauldin, J., Bamberg, March, 1921. Proceedings on a claim of H. M. Brabham against Mrs. Lura Brabham, as executrix of Sue Turner, deceased, opposed by T. E. Turner, a brother of deceased, and a legatee under'her will. From an order of the Circuit Court sustaining the allowance of the claim by the Probate Judge, T. E. Turner appeals. The decedent was the aunt of the claimant’s wife and had resided with claimant and his wife continuously for several years prior to her death. The claimant’s wife testilled that there was an agreement when she came to live with them as to paying board; that…
1Opinion of the Court
. The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Mauldin, sustaining the ordei: of Probate Judge in allowing a claim of Dr. Brabham against the estate of Miss Turner for board and lodging and medical services; the contention being that the claim for board and lodging should not be allowed, as the same were furnished as a gratuity. The exceptions, four in number, are overruled under the authority of Dash v. Inabinet, 53 S. C., 386; 31 S. E., 297; Wessinger v. Roberts, 67 S. C., 245; 45 S. E., 169; and Kaminer v. Kaigler, 113 S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dash v. InabinetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Wessinger v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Kaminer v. KaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924