Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1920No. Appeal, No. 81PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 81, April T., 1921, by the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, from order of the Public Service Commission, Nos. C. 3150, 3228 and 3229, in the case of the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company v. The Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on appeal, and the Pressed Steel Car Company and Carnegie Steel Company, intervening appellees.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 81, April T., 1921, by the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, from order of the Public Service Commission, Nos. C. 3150, 3228 and 3229, in the case of the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company v. The Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on appeal, and the Pressed Steel Car Company and Carnegie Steel Company, intervening appellees. From the record it appeared that the Pressed Steel Car Company and Carnegie Steel Company filed a complaint before the Public Service Commission alleging that the highway bridge over the tracks and right of way of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

On March 27, 1920, the car company and the steel company joined in a complaint to the commission against the Borough of McKees Rocks, the receivers of the Pittsburgh Railways Company, and the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, alleging that a bridge in the borough — part of a public highway — extending over the tracks of the railroad company was out of repair and closed to use by vehicles to the detriment of complainants and the public generally. They asked appropriate relief by the commission.

The record shows that the bridge — known as Q’Donovan’s bridge — was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Denver & Rio Grande R. Co. v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API