Legal Opinion

Comeaux v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1931No. 14173Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In a motion for rehearing, accompanied by many citations of precedents and supported by a forceful argument, counsel for the appellant insists that this court erred in declaring that the trial judge was not in error in holding that the search warrant justifiied the search that was made in the garage in which the contraband liquor was found. In argument, the opinion in McTyre v. State, 19 S. W. (2d) 49, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 31, is especially stressed. In McTyre’s case, supra, application was made to search a “private residence”. In executing the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Craft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. McTyre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Seale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Ramsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API